LOOKING DEEPER
We started with a close evaluation of the platform
We mapped out Zoom’s existing features against a typical remote learning workflow. We simulated student interactions (joining breakout rooms, raising hands, navigating chat) and documented what supported or hindered engagement in an Excel sheet.
Screenshot of Excel sheet
WHAT WE FOUND
Few opportunities for connection
Zoom prioritises formal delivery over informal interaction, leaving few opportunities for spontaneous communication with peers or educators. This makes it difficult to replicate face-to-face learning environments.
Limited feedback channels
There are minimal ways for students to signal engagement, confusion or emotional response during class. Temporary reactions and chat functions are easily missed, leading to the reduced visibility of student needs in real time.
No customisation for learning environments
There are a lack of options for tailoring layouts, roles or functions to suit different teaching styles, study formats (group work vs. lectures) and accessibility needs.
Poor LMS integration
As a standalone tool, Zoom lacks integration with learning management systems. This places an additional burden on students to navigate multiple platforms and systems.